Main content start

Lockean Populism

Speaker
Kajo Kubala, Postdoctoral Fellow, Stanford Civics Initiative, Emily "Sal" Salamanca, Postdoctoral Fellow, Stanford Civics Initiative
Date
Fri June 5th 2026, 11:30am - 1:00pm
Location
Graham Stuart Lounge - Encina Hall West, Room 400
Abstract
Research on populism has largely divided into two disconnected approaches: empirical political science, which explains populism through measurable social and institutional conditions, and normative political theory, which treats it as a pathology of liberal democracy. This article argues that both approaches rest on a contestable historical assumption that liberalism and populism are fundamentally opposed traditions. Taking John Locke as a central case, we recover a populist logic embedded in the Second Treatise and develop a fourpart theory of “Lockean populism.” Unlike dominant theories, this framework treats populism as regimeindifferent, morally rather than institutionally triggered, grounded in the people as a permanent constituent power, and independent of charismatic leadership. We test the theory against three cases—the nineteenth century Chartists, the South Korean candlelight protests, and Chile’s 2019 estallido social—showing how it explains forms of popular mobilization that existing typologies misclassify or overlook. The article ultimately reframes populism not as liberalism’s external enemy, but as a latent possibility within liberalism itself.
Biography
Kajo Kubala studies the role that corporations (broadly understood) have played in the history of political thought. His work investigates how corporate theory has shaped political thinking and contributed to the development of cardinal concepts within our political vocabulary, including the state, the social contract, the right of resistance, and representation.Kajo’s doctoral dissertation charted a genealogy of the corporation that uncovered the moral casualties suffered by our political language due to the modern hegemony of the concession theory of the corporation, as well as the streamlining of the corporation itself into a private, for-profit, economic form of association.Emily “Sal” Salamanca is a political theorist whose research centers on ancient political thought and its reception, with particular attention to elite institutions, wealth inequality, and the aesthetics of law in self-governing communities. Her dissertation-based book manuscript, Legitimizing Luxury: Sumptuary Laws and Democratic Aesthetics in Athens, Rome, and Venice, reconstructs how legislation regulating the display—but not the holding—of wealth served as a consistent strategy for elites to secure power and legitimacy within broadly egalitarian political frameworks. By examining Athenian, Roman, and Venetian regimes, the project demonstrates how sumptuary laws mediated the tension between aristocratic lifestyles and democratic ideals, often at the expense of non-citizens, including women, foreigners, and religious minorities.Her broader research agenda explores the ways myths, religious norms, and political rituals have been deployed to legitimize authority and preserve communal cohesion. She has published on topics ranging from Athenian ostracism understood as a collective ritual of democratic self-preservation, Machiavelli’s reworking of Florentine foundation myths, to Tocqueville’s projection of Protestant religiosity in Democracy in America. A second book project, in development, investigates the figure of the exile as a rhetorical and exemplary device in the history of political thought, from Greek and Roman antiquity through Renaissance humanism, analyzing how narratives of banishment shaped both communal self-understanding and later interpretive traditions.Alongside her research, Salamanca maintains active interests in political historiography, democratic theory, and the reception of classical antiquity. Her work has appeared in journals such as American Political Thought, Philosophies, Polis, and Carte Italiane, with further pieces forthcoming in the Review of Politics. She has also contributed to interdisciplinary scholarship in Italian studies and Classics, including translations and analyses of literary and cinematic texts.The discussant for this workshop is Dan Edelstein, Stanford University William H. Bonsall Professor of French, Professor of History and of Political Science (by courtesy), the Faculty Director of Stanford Introductory Studies and, the W. Warren Shelden University Fellow in Undergraduate Education