Ethics Small Grants for Graduate Students
The McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society offers graduate students two funding opportunities to either support their research or build collaborations in ways that meaningfully engage with ethical questions. We have the Community Building Grant and the Research Grant.
Community Building Grant
The Community Building Grant supports creating events or programs that encourage reflection on the ethical dimensions of research, professional commitments, and career choices.
Potential programs could include: the development of a new ethics workshop for grad students, hosting an event about the ethical issues in your field, organizing an ethics working group, among many other possibilities. The grants are intended to support programs or events that will engage the Stanford community and/or other graduate students, but not for individual research or projects.
Funding amount: up to $1,000. If you have an idea that requires more than $1,000, please send it our way. We may have other suggestions for funding sources.
How can funds be used? Possible expenses include but are not limited to: travel costs or fees for guest speakers, food expenses for events, creating marketing materials, or to purchase other materials needed for the program (books, software, printing, etc).
Who can apply? Stanford graduate and professional school students, as well as Tech Ethics and Policy Grad Fellows.
Proposals are accepted on a rolling basis. Please try to submit your grant at least one month in advance of your event/program. For larger events/programs, please allow six weeks or more.
Summer Proposals are permitted.
Research Grant
The Research Grant provides funding to support research activities that broadly connect to ethics.
Potential uses for funding include: conference travel and fees where you are a presenter, paying research subjects, or data collection costs.
Funding amount: Up to $2,000. Proposals for larger than $2,000 may be considered in exceptional circumstances. Students cannot receive multiple sources of funding for the same expenses.
Who can apply? McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society Graduate Fellows, Tech Ethics and Policy Grad Fellows, SGSI Course Students
Application Requirements:
- 2-3 page Project Summary
- CV
- Unofficial Transcript
- Budget Spreadsheet
- IRB Certification (if applicable)
- Letter of Acceptance for Conference Travel
When are the proposals due? Proposals are evaluated on a rolling basis.
Recipients will be notified within three weeks of submitting their proposal.
Funding can take up to six weeks to be transferred.
Students cannot receive funds multiple times from the grant.
Applications for summer research or travel are permitted.
All Grants are treated as taxable income.
Funding amount
Up to $1,000 for Community Building Grants and up to $2,000 for Research Grants.
When are the proposals due?
Proposals are evaluated on a rolling basis during the academic school year.
Who can apply?
Stanford graduate and professional students (Community Building Grants) and McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society Graduate Fellows or students who completed the SGSI course on Ethics and the Academy or Tech Ethics and Policy Grad Fellows (Research Grants)
Questions?
Please contact the Director of Graduate & Undergraduate Programs, Collin Anthony Chen (canthony [at] stanford.edu (canthony[at]stanford[dot]edu)) if you have any questions.
2025-26 Grant Recipients
Grad Research Grant Recipients 2025-26
Building capacity for genomic research in East Africa | Tami Gjorgjieva, Genetics
While the field of human genetics has invested significantly in collecting data from globally diverse populations, it has not made comparable investments in developing global capabilities for genomic research. This project fills that gap. In collaboration with the Tanzania Human Genetics Organization (THGO), a national nonprofit focused on developing genomic research and policy in Tanzania, we have been working on several initiatives aimed at supporting early-career research trainees in East Africa. This research is focused specifically on evaluating the effectiveness of one of those initiatives, the MERIT (Mentorship and Research Individualized Training) program. In MERIT, 25 mentees from East Africa are matched with mentors from the United States and Europe to work on a specific research analysis over 8 weeks; pairs are matched based on complementary needs and expertise. To understand how effective and scalable this program is, we are conducting pre-, mid-, and post-MERIT surveys as well as post-MERIT interviews with all participants; we will combine this data with that of our pilot MERIT program that took place in 2025 with 8 participants. This community-engaged work and research will provide insights on how to build collaborations between academics from the Global South and Global North to foster local expertise in genomic research.
Deep Sketch-Based 3D Modeling | Alberto Tono, Civil and Environmental Engineering
This grant funded support for my research paper, "Deep Sketch-Based 3D Modeling: A Survey.” Our work surveys how artificial intelligence translates simple human sketches into complex 3D models and invites human-center reflections. While this technology makes 3D creation more accessible to everyone, it also raises critical ethical questions. Who owns the rights to AI-generated 3D art when the models are trained on human creations? How do we prevent these tools from amplifying cultural biases or being used to generate harmful content? By systematically analyzing the current landscape of sketch-to-3D technologies, our project not only maps technical progress but emphasizes the urgent need to design these systems responsibly. My paper fostered vital discussions among researchers about building ethical frameworks directly into creative AI tools, ensuring they empower users while safeguarding intellectual property and cultural integrity.
The Politicization of Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)| Tom Nachtigal, School of Education
This research examines how Social-Emotional Learning (SEL), once a broadly supported, bipartisan educational framework focused on students’ emotional well-being, relationships, and responsible decision-making, became a highly contested political issue in the United States. Using a unique dataset of more than 2,100 SEL-related state policies and a newly constructed 50-state panel dataset covering 2010–2025, the project investigates how partisan actors, media organizations, advocacy groups, and policymakers attached ideological meaning to SEL and transformed it from an administrative consensus into a political battleground. The study seeks to identify the social, cultural, and institutional conditions that drive the politicization of education policy, while also addressing ethical questions about how researchers can study contentious public issues without reinforcing polarization.
Climate Change and Access to Debt | June Choi, Earth Systems Science
Addressing climate change through both mitigation and adaptation is anticipated to require global investments of more than $6 trillion annually by 2035. However, many countries face significant barriers to accessing the finance needed for these investments due to low or absent credit ratings, large debt burdens, and high borrowing costs. There is concern that climate change, through its economic impacts, may amplify these barriers, potentially locking countries into a “vicious cycle” in which mounting losses further constrain their capacity to invest in adaptation and mitigation. This research provides evidence that the cost of capital for many countries has already been shaped by their historical exposure to tropical cyclones and warming temperatures. More broadly, this work highlights the urgency of accounting for the unevenly distributed impacts of climate change in global climate finance negotiations. For instance, a core principle of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR), which recognizes that countries have contributed unequally to the greenhouse gas emissions driving climate change. This research was presented at the 30th UN Conference of the Parties (COP) in Brazil, where one of the key topics was mobilizing finance for Loss and Damages arising from climate change.
Emotions and the Brain | Mason Hu, Computational and Mathematical Engineering
This project explores how artificial intelligence can help us better understand the emotional patterns hidden within human brain activity. Using ultra-high-field functional MRI data, I train deep learning models to recognize how different emotions—such as joy, fear, or calm—appear in the brain when people experience natural stories and films. Rather than relying on pre-defined brain maps, the model learns directly from data, identifying patterns that align with long-established psychological dimensions such as valence (positive vs. negative) and arousal (calm vs. intense).
Beyond its technical contributions, the project also reflects on the ethical challenges of interpreting emotion from neural signals. By addressing issues of privacy, bias, and responsible communication of results, this research aims to advance both scientific understanding and ethical awareness in neurotechnology. The work was presented at the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society’s Neural Engineering (NER 2025) conference in San Diego this November. Ultimately, this study seeks to promote the transparent and responsible use of AI in understanding the human mind.
Neuroimaging and Charitable Giving| Tara Srirangarajan, Psychology
My research advances our fundamental understanding of how neural and psychological processes shape collective responses to environmental imagery on social media while offering tools to promote conservation and charitable giving. Visual imagery can motivate environmental advocacy and charitable giving, but the mechanisms underlying their broad appeal remain unclear. To understand how images of wildlife species elicit online engagement, we investigated links between behavioral probes, neuroimaging data (n=37), and social media engagement data from National Geographic’s Instagram content stream.
Graduate Community Building Grant Recipients 2025-26
Critical AI Working Group
The funding supported a series of events and workshop meetings organized by the Stanford Critical AI Group. The goal is to convene an intellectually grounding, community-building gathering that sets the tone for the group’s work on the ethical, social, and political dimensions of artificial intelligence (AI). This will be achieved by hosting external speakers whose work critically engages with AI’s societal consequences and by creating a welcoming space for dialogue through a shared meal.
Past Grant Recipient: Blood Donation in West Africa
Jlateh “Vincent” Jappah, Health Policy | Grad Research Grant Recipient 2024-25
Blood shortage is a global phenomenon. There is a high demand for blood and blood products globally, with a disproportionately higher demand in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, where every country in these two regions has a significant shortage. The existence of global blood deserts, especially in rural settings, impedes access to critical blood transfusions for marginalized populations. Although there appears to be a market for blood, such discussions draw a level of repugnance in some settings. This project explores the impact of non-cash incentives and/or the provision of important information on the benefits of blood donation on blood donation rates in Ghana and Sierra Leone, West Africa.
Past Grant Recipient: Measuring the Safety of AI Models
Samantha Bennett, Philosophy | Grad Research Grant Recipient 2024-25
As AI systems develop at a dizzying pace, there is a critical need to ensure they are safe not only technically but also ethically. I develop a provisional framework using Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL) to formalize reasoning about AI safety scenarios. By modeling safety information as dynamic updates—through public announcements of test outcomes and private disclosures in audit settings—the framework captures how different testing approaches affect the knowledge states of developers, auditors, and end-users. This model aims to guide practitioners in evaluating whether AI systems adhere to evolving safety guidelines.
Past Grant Recipient: Do Large Language Models Behave as They Should?
Kevin Klyman (International Policy Student) | Grad Research Grant Recipient 2024-25
AI companies increasingly use lists of ethical statements to guide the behavior of their complex systems. However, there are no assessments of whether large language models behave in line with these “constitutions” or “model specifications.” Through the use of this grant, our research will address this gap in transparency and evaluation by building the first assessment of whether large language models behave as their creators intend. This work includes analyzing ethical use guidelines, generating data for evaluation, and building software to audit leading commercial AI systems. Creating novel tools for testing if large language models behave as they should can help engineers, lawmakers, and ethicists better steer AI to be safe and beneficial.
Past Grant Recipient: Speaking as citizens: The politics of discourse in multilingual Africa
Camille DeJarnett, Political Science | Grad Research Grant Recipient 2024-2025
How does the lack of a shared national language affect how states relate to citizens, and citizens to one Another? My project examines this question in the linguistically diverse context of sub-Saharan Africa where, lacking majority native languages, most states use former colonial languages for official purposes. However, in most cases few citizens speak these languages fluently, potentially placing limits on their civic participation. Using both empirical and normative approaches, my work examines the relationship between a state’s language environment and its citizens’ engagement in civic life, assessing whether a state’s language policy choices might help or hinder active citizenship.
Past Grant Recipient: AI Ethics and the Global South
AI Ethics and the Global South Recipient: Evani Radiya-Dixit (Sociology grad student), 2023-24 academic year. Many existing AI design, deployment, and research practices are not oriented toward the diversity of global cultures. Yet, considering cultural contexts and injustices is critical in these practices, especially as AI products are deployed globally. The proposed funds provided Evani the opportunity to share her research with international scholars and practitioners, interested in the ethics and societal impacts of technology. According to her research, the term “Global South” has become increasingly popular, but suffers from several limitations. Her work proposes an alternative model that builds upon South-South solidarity and offers structural changes that consider the plurality of cultures within and across countries.
Past Grant Recipient: The China Law and Policy Association (CLPA)
Graduate Community Building Grant Recipient 2024-25
The China Law and Policy Association (CLPA) hosted a book talk with Professor Shitong Qiao of Duke University Law School on his book, The Authoritarian Commons: Neighborhood Democratization in Urban China (Cambridge University Press, 2025). The event engaged Stanford students and faculty in a conversation on the intersection of law and ethics of residential community participation in authoritarian regimes. Professor Qiao’s book draws on six years of fieldwork to explore how homeowner associations (HOAs) in China have created new spaces of participatory governance and ethical dilemmas in collective decision-making.
Past Grant Recipient: re:think—Humanists Beyond the PhDs
Graduate Community Building Grant Recipient 2024-25
re:think—Humanists Beyond the PhD is a new and growing student organization on campus. Started in Autumn 2024, the organization gathers graduate students and professionals in a variety of fields to have productive and collaborative conversations about the value and meaning of humanities graduate education in a rapidly changing professional and social landscape. The grant supported two events, Do I Have To Sell My Soul? Re:Thinking Our Values, and Re:Thinking Your Network, both of which invited speakers and participants to share the ways in which their values directly impacted their professional career and work.